Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Withrow v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shield, Inc. Salary Protection Plan
- K Corp. Enterprises v. Fidelity Nat. Financial CA5
- United States v. Anthony Casias
- Mitchell Fields v. Cheryl Burson
- People v. Mendoza CA5
- Francisco Merchan Rocha v. Veronica Florez
- United States v. Francisco Rodriguez-Garcia
- Alex Lange v. Tim Nickerson
- United States v. Adalberto Rivera
- United States v. Daniel Carreon-Ortiz
- United States v. Jose De La Torre-Ventura
- Kent v. Lake Don Pedro Com. Services Dist. CA5
- People v. Velyines CA5
- David Rey v. C&H Sugar Co.
- Glenn Leatherbury v. C&H Sugar Co.
- Jancso v. Vinod CA5
- People v. Johnson CA5
- Ronald Allen, Jr. v. Robert Smith
- United States v. Daniel Blow
- United States v. Julio Hernandez-Torres
- Joseph O'Bryne v. Portfolio Recovery Associates
- Smith v. Kern County Superintendent of Schools CA5
- People v. Velasco-Palacios CA5
- Salvatore Gallucci v. Henry Gonzales
- In re Logan H. CA5