Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Pierson v. Helmerich & Payne Internat. Drilling Co. CA5
- Citizens for Ceres v. City of Ceres
- United States v. Damaso Arellanes-Zarate
- United States v. Michael Salas
- United States v. Casey Conley
- United States v. Erika MacIas-jimenez
- United States v. Hector Corrales Edeza
- United States v. Jesus Jeronimo-Carrillo
- United States v. Jorge Ausencio Gil-Velasquez
- United States v. Leandro Regalado
- United States v. Sissy Solano-Yanez
- United States v. Steven Montano
- People v. Williams CA5
- Maurice King v. Bank of America
- Walter Shaw v. Veterans Health Administration
- Esparza v. Kaweah Delta District Hospital
- Rogelio Espinoza v. Marion Spearman
- Jonathan Cohen v. Loretta Lynch
- United States v. Francisco Gallo-Tavizon
- United States v. Francisco Velazquez
- United States v. Jorge Navidad
- United States v. Norma Barrancas-Sanchez
- Freitas v. Shiomoto
- Citizens for Ceres v. City of Ceres
- Citizens for Ceres v. City of Ceres