Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Association of Irritated Residents v. Department of Conservation
- United States v. Jose Nava
- United States v. Francisco Gasca-Ruiz
- Kevin Park v. webloyalty.com, Inc.
- Tjaden v. HSBC Bank USA, National Ass'n
- People v. Cook
- Michael Cuero v. Matthew Cate
- Raymond Goodlow v. City of El Cajon
- The Best Service Co. v. Emily Bayley
- Kathleen Gates v. McT Group, Inc.
- Fred MacDonald v. United States
- People v. Cook
- Medina v. GEICO Indemnity Co.
- United States v. Rufino Peralta-Sanchez
- People v. Lamb
- Merced Irrigation District v. Superior Court of Merced County
- Backcountry Against Dumps v. Sally Jewell
- Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation v. U.S. Department of the Interior
- Stand up for California v. State of Cal.
- J. Jennings, Jr. v. Ramos Properties, L.P.
- People v. Buford
- People v. Navarette
- Carl Schwartz v. Arena Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Lee v. West Kern Water District
- Kevin Bryant v. Seleaina Thomas