Samuel Diaz, Jr.
F--
17% — 2 of 12 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 99% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
52cases reviewed on appeal
33%reversed, in whole or part, of 48 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 29 reversed in part 12 reversed 4 modified 3 dismissed 2 writ granted 1 writ denied 1
Areas
criminal 49 probate 1 delinquency 1 civil 1
By year: 2023 12 · 2025 7 · 2024 7 · 2022 7 · 2020 7 · 2021 5 · 2026 3 · 2017 2 · 2019 1 · 2013 1 ·
Analysis
27reviewed cases analysed
74rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
7cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- People v. Brown CA4/2
- People v. Martin CA4/1
- Conservatorship of C.S. CA4/1
- People v. Crawford CA4/1
- People v. Wansor CA4/1
- Angulo v. Super. Ct.
- People v. Ahmad CA4/2
- People v. Clayton CA4/1
- People v. Samano CA4/2
- Hernandez v. Nunez CA4/2
- People v. Barnes CA4/2
- People v. Stewart CA4/2
- People v. Witous CA4/1
- People v. Pellegrin CA4/1
- People v. Robinson
- People v. Huffman CA4/2
- People v. George CA4/2
- People v. Salcido CA4/2
- People v. Guzman CA4/1
- People v. Rupert CA4/2
- People v. Meza CA4/2
- People v. Zemek
- People v. Salcido CA4/2
- People v. Castro CA4/1
- People v. Grissom CA4/2