Rudi M. Brewster
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
58cases reviewed on appeal
1opinions authored
5panels sat on (not as author)
28%reversed, in whole or part, of 43 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 31 vacated 5 reversed 4 reversed in part 3 dismissed 2
Areas
By year: 1997 19 · 1998 10 · 1993 7 · 2005 3 · 1996 3 · 2007 2 · 2006 2 · 2003 2 · 2001 2 · 2000 2 · 1999 2 · 2009 1 · 2008 1 · 2004 1 · 2002 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Samson v. NAMA HOLDINGS, LLC
- Art Attacks Ink, LLC v. Mga Entertainment
- LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. Gateway, Inc.
- Asset Marketing v. Gagnon
- Qualcomm Inc. v. Broadcom Corp.
- Lucent Technologies Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.
- Ministry of Defense v. Elahi
- Ministry of Defense and Support for the Islamic Republic of Iran v. Elahi
- Klein v. San Diego County
- Josephs v. Pacific Bell
- Josephs v. Pacific Bell
- No. 03-55939
- Turecek v. County of San Diego
- United States v. Fatima Peyton
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USA
- City Of San Diego v. Christine Todd Whitman
- Desert Citizens Against Pollution v. Henri R. Bisson
- Powers v. Eichen
- San Diego Chapter Of The Surfrider Foundation v. John B. Dalton
- Warn v. Maridome