Ross
F--
91% — 29.0 of 32 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 99% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Hagerty v. Powers
- Careaga v. Fernald
- Thompson v. Spray
- Thompson v. Spraig
- Hancock v. Plummer
- Chapman v. Polack
- Polack v. Gurnee
- Roller v. Sutter St. R.R.
- Marshall v. Livermore Spring Water Co.
- Schroeder v. Grady
- Ganahl v. Soher
- Lewis v. S. Pac. Coast R.R.
- Dorland v. Dorland
- Beach v. Hodgdon
- Tischler v. Cal. Farmers' Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
- Bull v. Ford
- Dunne v. Dunne
- Eastin v. Bank of Stockton
- Calkins v. Steinbach
- Martin v. Hill
- Gilman v. Curtis
- Pereira v. Cent. Pac. R.R.
- In re Estate of Hopper
- Vogt v. Cope
- Sweetland v. Shattuck