Ross
F--
91% — 29.0 of 32 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 99% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- People ex rel. Leverson v. Thompson
- Sawyer v. Sargent
- Oakland Bank of Savings v. Applegarth
- Rutledge v. Superior Court of Humboldt County
- Weihe v. Statham
- Barnett v. County of Contra Costa
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. McCusker
- Powers v. Crane
- Brandon v. Leddy
- Learned v. Castle
- Silverberg v. Phenix Insurance Co.
- Hart v. W. Union Tel. Co.
- Hughes v. Parsons
- Monroe v. Cooper
- Spottiswood v. Weir
- Pardee v. Gray
- McKee v. Preston
- Healy v. O'Brien
- Chester v. Hill
- Wisp v. Hazard
- Chester v. Toklas
- Estate of Apple
- People v. Rae
- Dwain v. Descalso
- People v. Holladay