Ross
F--
91% — 29.0 of 32 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 99% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Lake County v. Sulphur Bank Quicksilver Mining Co.
- Hobart v. Tyrrell
- Barton v. Brown
- Wyrick v. Weck
- Hirschfeld v. Cross
- Lake Pleasanton Water Co. v. Contra Costa Water Co.
- Taylor v. Middleton
- Dent v. Bird
- Sweeney v. Stanford
- Grangers' Business Ass'n v. Clark
- Eel River & Eureka Railroad v. Field
- Wilson v. Barnard
- Smith v. Strother
- Cox v. Hayes
- Scheerer v. Edgar
- Weihe v. Statham
- Somers v. Overhulser
- Brown v. Willis
- People ex rel. Board of State Harbor Commissioners v. Potrero & Bay View Railroad
- Little v. Jacks
- Escolle v. Franks
- Robinson v. Irish-American Benevolent Society
- Wallace v. Center
- Cheney v. J. R. Newberry & Co.
- Cheney v. J. R. Newberry & Co.