Ross
F--
91% — 29.0 of 32 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 99% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- Ex parte Raye
- City & County of San Francisco v. Talbot
- Dinan v. Gibbon
- Bryce v. Joynt
- Sullivan v. Shanklin
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Stroup
- Hayward v. Rogers
- Nevada Bank v. Steinmitz
- Spring Valley Water Works v. Board of Supervisors
- Seehorn v. Big Meadows & Bodie Wagon Road Co.
- In re Naphtaly
- Wedel v. Herman
- People v. Brown
- Mulligan v. Smith
- People v. Parks
- Wood v. Board of Election Commissioners
- Shattuck v. Oakland Smelting & Refining Co.
- Rosenberg v. Frank
- Miller v. Heilbron
- Aguirre v. Alexander
- People v. Pfister
- People v. Furtado
- Omnibus Railroad v. Baldwin
- Spring Valley Water Works v. Board of Supervisors
- People v. Bennett