Ross
F--
91% — 29.0 of 32 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 99% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Davis
- People v. O'Neil
- Brown v. Moore
- Staude v. Board of Election Commissioners
- Mappa v. Council of Los Angeles
- Dougherty v. Haggin
- Nickerson v. California Raisin Co.
- Spring Valley Water Works v. Board of Supervisors
- Taylor v. McClain
- Chaquette v. Ortet
- Stockton Savings & Loan Society v. Donnelly
- Schroeder v. Schweizer Lloyd Transport Versicherungs Gesellschaft
- Alpers v. Brown
- People v. Cowell
- Cummings v. Dudley
- Joseph v. Dougherty
- Rousset v. Reay
- Morse v. Wright
- Seehorn v. Big Meadows & Bodie Wagon Road Co.
- Hinds v. Marmolejo
- People v. Martin
- Ex parte Wallingford
- Nessler v. Bigelow
- In re Naphtaly
- Clark v. Ritter