Clark v. Ritter
ANTHONY CLARK v. JENNIE B. RITTER
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Ross (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Ross
Ross, J.:
The Court below properly granted a nonsuit as to the defendant Hayward, because the proof on the part of the plaintiff showed that Hayward was not a partner at the time of the commencement of the action, nor at any time when the transactions occurred of which an accounting is demanded; and because the interest of Hayward in the premises had its inception prior to June 11,1878, after which time it was that the agreement was made out of which plaintiff’s claim for an accounting arises, and to which agreement Hayward was neither a party nor privy.
Judgment and order affirmed.
Myrick and McKinstry, JJ., concurred.