Ronald F. Frazier
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of San Diego 2009–
B--
70% — 71 of 102 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 38% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
59cases reviewed on appeal
37%reversed, in whole or part, of 54 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 33 reversed 19 writ denied 2 dismissed 2 reversed in part 1 other 1 modified 1
Areas
civil 52 dependency 4 criminal 3
By year: 2023 17 · 2021 13 · 2024 11 · 2020 4 · 2016 3 · 2013 3 · 2022 2 · 2019 2 · 2014 2 · 2026 1 · 2025 1 ·
Analysis
104reviewed cases analysed
350rulings read
1rulings where the model disagrees with the court
8cases with a verified missed authority
1appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- Maas v. McKinnon Broadcasting Co. CA4/1
- Bacon v. Cal. Dept. of Motor Vehicles CA4/1
- Phanichkul v. Yeng CA4/1
- Breckenridge Property Fund 2016 v. Sperlein CA4/1
- Hollendorfer v. California Horse Racing Board CA4/1
- Luna v. Crane Development Corporation CA4/1
- Extreme Transportation v. Salazar CA4/1
- Deen v. Deen CA4/1
- Backcountry Against Dumps v. San Diego County Bd. of Supervisors CA4/1
- G.F. Galaxy Corp. v. Johnson
- G.F. Galaxy Corporation v. Johnson CA4/1
- Save Jacumba v. San Diego County Bd. of Supervisors CA4/1
- 1600 Barberry Lane 8 v. Mikles CA4/1
- Garrabrants v. Erhart
- Simmons v. EHM Architecture CA4/1
- People v. Golden CA4/1
- Vidal v. Pick Axe Holding CA4/1
- RWB Platinum Vape v. Sadler CA4/1
- Edwards-Behar v. Dobry CA4/1
- Peterson v. Chasan Family Trust CA4/1
- Brains Work Group v. OME Ventures CA4/1
- SDTJ v. Chang CA4/1
- Corrales v. Cal. Gambling Control Com.
- Corrales v. California Gambling Control Commission CA4/1
- Showa Hospitality v. Sentinel Insurance Co. CA4/1