Rodriguez
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Cole v. Super. Ct.
- People v. Williams CA1/3
- Casa Mira Homeowners Assn. v. Cal. Coastal Com.
- People v. Wyatt CA1/3
- Russian Riverkeeper v. City of Ukiah CA1/3
- Honchariw v. FJM Private Mortgage Fund CA1/3
- People v. Harris CA1/3
- Avoyan v. City of San Francisco CA1/3
- Casa Mira Homeowners Assn. v. Cal. Coastal Com.
- People v. Graham CA1/3
- V.A. v. Superior Court CA1/3
- People v. Jackson CA1/3
- Acord v. Linde CA1/3
- McNiven v. City of Berkeley CA1/3
- People v. Turner CA1/3
- People v. Meier CA1/3
- People v. Ford-Howard CA1/3
- People v. Acosta CA1/3
- People v. Jones CA1/3
- U.S. Glass & Aluminum v. Winco Window Co. CA1/3
- C.C. v. D.V.
- In re Alexander R. CA1/3
- Virgin Hotels San Francisco v. 250 Fourth Development CA1/3
- Cole v. Super. Ct.
- People v. Randolph CA1/3