Rodriguez
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Sand CA1/3
- People v. Wilfredo CA1/3
- In re A.J. CA1/3
- People v. Baldridge CA1/3
- People v. Millsap CA1/3
- People v. Harrison CA1/3
- People v. Bey CA1/3
- Suchard v. Sonoma Academy
- People v. Smith CA1/3
- People v. Amos CA1/3
- People v. Johnson CA1/3
- In re L.C. CA1/3
- Conservatorship of the Person of A.J.
- People v. Roberts CA1/3
- People v. Stone CA1/3
- Herren v. George S.
- In re Jose C. CA1/3
- People v. Kankel CA1/3
- People v. Wilson
- People v. Frostick CA1/3
- People v. Gribaldo CA1/3
- People v. Charles CA1/3
- People v. Williams CA1/3
- People v. Super. Ct. (Vandenburgh)
- Honchariw v. FJM Private Mortgage Fund CA1/3