Rodriguez
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Loma CA1/3
- People v. Newell CA1/3
- Doe v. Accor Hotels & Resorts (Maryland) CA1/3
- People v. Dorsey CA1/3
- People v. Huff CA1/3
- People v. Wayfer CA1/3
- McNiven v. Dreyfus CA1/3
- People v. Brinson
- Wang v. Peletta
- Berry v. Pope Valley Union Elementary School District CA1/3
- Ceron v. Liu
- People v. Luna CA1/3
- Norman v. Strateman
- People v. Stables CA1/3
- Citizens for a Better Eureka v. City of Eureka
- People v. Luna CA1/3
- Berry v. Pope Valley Union Elementary School District CA1/3
- Pelascini v. Airstream CA1/3
- Park v. Bradford Construction CA1/3
- People v. Villaneda CA1/3
- People v. Miller CA1/1
- Ibarra Professional Law Corp. v. Gu CA1/3
- People v. Diaz CA1/3
- Goebner v. Super. Ct.
- In re Kathryn H. CA1/3