Rodriguez
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Alvarez v. Ramirez CA1/3
- People v. Knighten CA1/3
- William B. v. Ann R. CA1/3
- Wildwood Builders v. Lee CA1/3
- Garcia-Rojas v. Franchise Tax Board
- People v. Kernan CA1/3
- People v. Thomas CA1/3
- Proppe v. Costello CA1/3
- In re J.H.
- Marriage of Ubamos CA1/3
- People v. Osorio CA1/3
- ZK Oakland Properties v. Golden Stream Properties CA1/3
- People v. Henriquez CA1/3
- People v. Puerto-DeEspinosa CA1/3
- Estate of Alder CA1/3
- In re B.P. CA1/3
- Sartipi v. Travis Credit Union CA1/3
- People v. Saucer CA1/3
- People v. Nguyen CA1/3
- Center for Biological Diversity, Inc. v. Public Utilities Com.
- In re M.D. CA1/3
- People v. Langley CA1/3
- People v. Thornton CA1/3
- Sonoma County Dept. of Child Support Services v. Ceja CA1/3
- People v. Rivera-Torres CA1/3