Rodriguez
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Gloede CA1/3
- People v. Tucker CA1/3
- People v. Boone CA1/3
- People v. Andrews CA1/3
- People v. Hicks CA1/3
- People v. Amador CA1/3
- Doe v. Nell CA1/3
- People v. Alfonso Q. CA1/3
- In re J.D. CA1/3
- Santora v. Santora CA1/3
- Chan v. Town of Atherton CA1/3
- County of Del Norte v. Britt
- People v. Mata CA1/3
- Askins v. CRST Expedited, Inc.
- People v. Zavala-Garcia CA1/3
- Busch v. Morgan CA1/3
- Doe v. Newsom CA1/3
- People v. Pollano CA1/3
- Bushey v. Jensen CA1/3
- People v. Corona CA1/3
- J.People v. Super.Ct. CA1/3
- People v. Bankers Ins. Co.
- County of Sonoma v. Kelly CA1/3
- Pridgen v. Robustelli CA1/3
- People v. Cannon CA1/3