Rodriguez
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Martinez CA1/3
- Lebolt v. City and County of S.F. CA1/3
- People v. Tunstall CA1/3
- Rezapour v. U.S. Bank Nat. Assn. CA1/3
- Thompson, Welch, Soroko & Gilbert v. Jones CA1/3
- People v. Battle CA1/3
- Park v. Law Offices of Tracey Buck-Walsh
- People v. Turner
- Fox v. Forster CA1/3
- Theresa D. v. MBK Senior Living LLC
- People v. Edwards CA1/3
- People v. Bowen CA1/3
- In re Laylah L.-T. CA1/3
- Weinstein v. City of Oakland CA1/3
- Terri R. v. Superior Court CA1/3
- Theresa D. v. MBK Senior Living CA1/3
- Spahn v. Richards
- Samuels v. Hamrick & Evans CA1/3
- People v. Edwards CA1/3
- People v. Garcia-Torres CA1/3
- People v. Ruiz CA1/3
- People v. Porter CA1/3
- L. Byron Culver & Associates v. Jaoudi Industrial & Trading Corp.
- People v. Quirk
- Curtis v. State Ex Rel. Department of Transporation