Rodriguez
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Paule v. Asram Properties, LLC CA1/3
- In re C.B. CA1/3
- Roesler v. Nella Terra Cellars CA1/3
- Feltham v. Universal Protection Service, LP
- People v. Motuapuaka CA1/3
- Haley v. Antunovich
- People v. Mack CA1/3
- People v. Ford CA1/3
- People v. McCormack CA1/3
- Roesler v. Nella Terra Cellars CA1/3
- People v. Contreras CA1/3
- People v. Mosby CA1/3
- People v. Seegmiller CA1/3
- In re Gregory A. CA1/3
- People v. Yale CA1/3
- People v. Woodson CA1/3
- Balistreri v. Balistreri
- People v. Flores
- Lebolt v. City and County of S.F. CA1/3
- T-N.H. v. Superior Court CA1/3
- Lebolt v. City and County of S.F. CA1/3
- People v. Weldon CA1/3
- Conservatorship of Bryan B. CA1/3
- People v. Tevaseu CA1/3
- Broadband ITV v. OpenTV CA1/3