Rodriguez
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- In re Josiah J. CA1/3
- 24th & Hoffman Investors, LLC v. Northfield Ins. Co.
- Mendez v. Civil Service Commission, etc. CA1/3
- Smith v. Yelp CA1/3
- Li v. Chiu CA1/3
- People v. Mendoza CA1/3
- In re K.O. CA1/3
- People v. Garcia CA1/3
- Doe v. The Regents of the U. of Cal.
- In re Micah Y. CA1/3
- County of Sonoma v. Pub. Employment Relations Bd.
- People v. Willis CA1/3
- Marriage of Deal
- People v. Flores
- Hume v. Hume CA1/3
- People v. Ballard CA1/3
- People v. Artykov CA1/3
- People v. Carlos CA1/3
- People v. Miller
- People v. Washington CA1/3
- People v. Shields CA1/3
- People v. Lawrence CA1/3
- Williams v. Sonic Automotive CA1/3
- In re M.S. CA1/3
- Grove v. Juul Labs, Inc.