Rodriguez
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- In re D.J. CA1/3
- People v. Vanhorn CA1/3
- People v. Valencia CA1/3
- People v. Zarazua
- People v. O'Day
- Abrahams v. Askew CA1/3
- In re D.M. CA1/3
- People v. Badue CA1/3
- People v. Garcia
- In re B.J.L. CA1/3
- People v. Alejandre CA1/3
- People v. VanHorn CA1/3
- People v. Ferreyra CA1/3
- Asbury v. City of Ukiah CA1/3
- Athletics Investment Group LLC v. Dept. of Toxic Substances Control
- Davia v. Be Wicked CA1/3
- People v. International Fidelity Ins. CA1/3
- People v. Payton CA1/3
- Athletics Investment Group v. Dept. of Toxic Substances Control
- In re A.F. CA1/3
- Tunucci v. City and County of S.F. CA1/3
- Golick v. State of Cal.
- Darquea v. Baev CA1/3
- People v. McFadden CA1/3
- Estate of Jones