Rodriguez
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Elqare Enterprises v. Red Whale CA1/3
- City and County of San Francisco v. Bato CA1/3
- People v. Fogleman CA1/3
- People v. Moss CA1/3
- Bennett v. Ohio National Life Assurance Corp.
- Melbostad v. Kasolas CA1/3
- Rodas-Gramajo v. Super. Ct.
- Claremont Canyon Conservancy v. Regents of the U. of Cal.
- Dominguez v. Iconiq Capital Management CA1/3
- Lei v. Yan CA1/3
- Perez v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan
- People v. Richardson CA1/3
- San Francisco Apartment Assn. v. City and County of San Francisco CA1/3
- Keading v. Keading CA1/3
- Wu v. Lian Tong, LLC CA1/3
- Seneca Leandro View v. Estate of Delmore CA1/3
- People v. Stockman CA1/3
- Young v. Schultz CA1/3
- Bernuy v. Bridge Property Management Co.
- Seneca Leandro View v. Estate of Delmore CA1/3
- Tidwell v. Tidwell CA1/3
- Gill v. Royal Ruby, Inc. CA1/3
- Wu v. Lian Tong, LLC CA1/3
- People v. Harrison CA1/3
- Cotzomi v. Universal Protection Service CA1/3