Rodriguez
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Watts CA1/3
- People v. Hamilton CA1/3
- People v. Jolivette CA1/3
- People v. Headen CA1/3
- People v. Knox CA1/3
- Marriage of Kouvabina and Veltman CA1/3
- Di Martini v. Superior Court
- University of San Francisco v. Community Initiatives CA1/3
- Center for Biological Diversity v. Public Utilities Com.
- In re Essure Product Cases
- Fair v. WV 23 Jumpstart CA1/3
- Timlick v. National Enterprise Systems CA1/3
- In re Essure Product Cases
- People v. Ruiz CA1/3
- Center for Biological Diversity v. Public Utilities Com.
- Center for Biological Diversity v. Public Utilities Com.
- People v. Salvant CA1/3
- Sunstate Equipment Co. v. Eagle Environmental & Construction CA1/3
- T.R. v. Superior Court CA1/3
- People v. Potter Handy, LLP
- P. ex rel. San Francisco Bay Conservation etc. v. Sweeney CA1/3
- People v. Marman CA1/3
- People v. Orozco CA1/3
- In re M.P. CA1/3
- People v. Sandher CA1/3