Robert Steven Huie
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 13 vacated 2 reversed in part 2 dismissed 2 reversed 1
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 5 reversed in part 1 dismissed 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2025 12 · 2026 6 · 2024 5 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Verduzco v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation (CDCR)
- Young v. Espino
- Silva v. Sayer
- Carnes v. Dexcom Inc.
- Oakland County Employees' Retirement System v. Dexcom, Inc.
- Alonzo v. Dexcom Inc.
- Samesurf, Inc. v. Intuit, Inc.
- Christopher v. The City of San Diego
- Rajaee v. Davis
- Rajaee v. Davis
- Roettker v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
- Bickerstaff v. Amazon.com Services, LLC
- Samesurf, Inc. v. Intuit, Inc.
- Shepard v. Veltmeyer
- Lopez v. Velocity Transport LLC
- Rao v. LaRose
- Davidson v. Palantir Technologies, Inc.
- Estate of Joe Anaya III v. Imperial County
- Estes v. County of San Diego
- Geoserve Energy Transport DMCC v. M/V 07 Vega S
- Baghirzade v. Armenian National Committee of America
- Baffert v. Wunderler
- Silva v. Sayer
- Hildebrandt v. Google LLC
- Fosbinder v. County of San Diego