Robert P. Dahlquist
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of San Diego 2003–
A+
87% — 131 of 150 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 7% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
64cases reviewed on appeal
19%reversed, in whole or part, of 64 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 51 reversed 8 reversed in part 4 modified 1
Areas
By year: 2015 13 · 2014 11 · 2013 10 · 2024 6 · 2023 6 · 2022 6 · 2025 5 · 2021 4 · 2016 2 · 2018 1 ·
Analysis
122reviewed cases analysed
443rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
22cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- Robertson v. Vu CA4/1
- RSF Associates, LLC v. Nieto CA4/1
- Hurley v. California Dept. of Parks and Recreation
- Santos v. Kisco Senior Living, LLC
- Newman v. Bank of America CA4/1
- San Dieguito Community Council v. County of San Diego CA4/1
- Buchanan v. Soto
- North County Advocates v. City of Carlsbad
- Kalicki v. ETrade Bank CA4/1
- North County Advocates v. City of Carlsbad CA4/1
- Rancho Pauma Mutual Water Co. v. Yuima Municipal Water District
- Pala Band of Mission Indians v. County of San Diego Dept. of Environmental Health CA4/1
- Yazdani v. Bank of America CA4/1
- Harjo v. Deutsche Bank Nat. Trust CA4/1
- Nezami v. Poladian CA4/1
- iLink Technology v. Zalinda Farms CA4/1
- Hemphill v. Wright Family, LLC
- Reynolds v. 2013-3 SFR Venture CA4/1
- Chen v. Jordan CA4/1
- Swartz v. Smith CA4/1
- Zephyr Investors v. Silva CA4/1
- FSH Services v. Dallenbach CA4/1
- Chen v. Bank of America CA4/1
- Getsen Acquisitions v. Zapf CA4/1
- Alpineri v. TGG Management Co. CA4/1