Richard S. Whitney
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of San Diego 2003–
C-
62% — 89 of 143 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 55% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
94cases reviewed on appeal
27%reversed, in whole or part, of 92 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 63 reversed 18 reversed in part 7 modified 4 writ granted 1 dismissed 1
Areas
By year: 2022 19 · 2021 15 · 2024 13 · 2023 11 · 2013 9 · 2014 8 · 2025 5 · 2016 4 · 2015 4 · 2026 3 · 2020 2 · 2019 1 ·
Analysis
176reviewed cases analysed
554rulings read
1rulings where the model disagrees with the court
30cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- Sylvania v. Acre Investment Real Estate Services CA4/1
- Downes v. Belmont Park Entertainment CA4/1
- Haida Group v. Regency Centers CA4/1
- Nilson v. White CA4/1
- Bordeaux v. State of Cal. Dept. of Child Support Services CA4/1
- Hakenjos Hall Prof. Services v. Korte/Schwartz CA4/1
- San Diegans for Open Govt. v. Fonseca
- Richmond v. Mikkelson CA4/1
- San Diegans for Open Government v. Fonseca
- SLPR v. San Diego Unified Port Dist. CA4/1
- Pristine Environments v. Signet Jewelers CA4/1
- Segerstrom v. Yergovich CA4/1
- Soofi v. Contreras Law Firm CA4/1
- M&F Fishing, Inc. v. Philadephia Indemnity Ins. Co. CA4/1
- People v. Young CA4/1
- City of San Diego v. Nelson CA4/1
- Burgess v. Coronado Unified School Dist.
- Rowan v. Hilliard CA4/1
- People v. Jimenez
- People v. Boegeman CA4/1
- People v. Brauns CA4/1
- People v. Burleson CA4/1
- People v. Middleton CA4/1
- People v. Harper CA4/1
- People v. Keating CA4/1