Richard S. Whitney
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of San Diego 2003–
C-
62% — 89 of 143 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 55% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
94cases reviewed on appeal
27%reversed, in whole or part, of 92 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 63 reversed 18 reversed in part 7 modified 4 writ granted 1 dismissed 1
Areas
By year: 2022 19 · 2021 15 · 2024 13 · 2023 11 · 2013 9 · 2014 8 · 2025 5 · 2016 4 · 2015 4 · 2026 3 · 2020 2 · 2019 1 ·
Analysis
176reviewed cases analysed
554rulings read
1rulings where the model disagrees with the court
30cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- Altbaum v. State of Cal. CA4/1
- Alphatec Spine v. NuVasive CA4/1
- Jacobs v. Sharp Healthcare CA4/1
- Barnett v. First American Home Warranty Corp. CA4/1
- Twins Luck Properties v. City of San Diego CA4/1
- Bealer v. County of San Diego CA4/1
- Cox v. Renfree CA4/1
- Preovolos v. Preovolos CA4/1
- Lesser v. Vaya Telecom CA4/1
- Nguyen v. Czygan CA4/1
- Baptiste v. Ralphs Grocery Co. CA4/1
- Jacob v. ESA Management CA4/1
- Bd. of Trustees of the United Food & Com. Workers etc v. City of San Diego CA4/1
- Ahn v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.
- Maddox v. Maddox CA4/1
- United Specialty Ins. Co. v. Barriga CA4/1
- Elsner v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. CA4/1
- Curamus Management v. Swiech CA4/1
- Save 30th Street Parking v. City of San Diego CA4/1
- Morgan v. Ygrene Energy Fund, Inc.
- Morgan v. Ygrene Energy Fund, Inc.
- Flowers v. Crawford CA4/1
- Shustak Reynolds & Partners, P.C. v. Weisbord CA4/1
- Krizan Associates v. Pereira CA4/1
- Shustak Reynolds & Partners v. Weisbord CA4/1