Richard E. L. Strauss
Presiding Justice, Superior Court of California, County of San Diego 2002–2003
C--
62% — 60 of 97 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 57% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
47cases reviewed on appeal
36%reversed, in whole or part, of 45 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 29 reversed 13 reversed in part 3 writ granted 1 dismissed 1
Areas
By year: 2021 9 · 2014 7 · 2016 6 · 2013 5 · 2017 4 · 2022 2 · 2020 2 · 2018 2 · 2015 2 · 2009 2 · 2023 1 · 2019 1 · 2010 1 · 2008 1 · 2001 1 · 2000 1 ·
Analysis
81reviewed cases analysed
280rulings read
2rulings where the model disagrees with the court
10cases with a verified missed authority
1appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- Takiguchi v. Venetian Condominiums Maintenance Corp.
- Kim v. R Consulting & Sales, Inc.
- Kim v. R Consulting & Sales, Inc.
- Gomez v. The Regents of the University of Cal.
- Davis v. Hosaka Nagel & Co. CA4/1
- A&B Market Plus, Inc. v. Arabo CA4/1
- A&B Market Plus, Inc. v. Arabo CA4/1
- Seth R. v. Lightbourne CA4/1
- Scales v. Bradley CA4/1
- Reid v. City of San Diego
- Reid v. City of San Diego
- Padron v. Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York
- Kendall v. Scripps Health
- Walters v. Boosinger
- Bajan v. Mikos CA4/1
- Adler v. City of National City CA4/1
- Enholm v. Cohen CA4/1
- Enholm v. Cohen CA4/1
- Guess v. Bernhardson
- Martin v. Withsosky CA4/1
- Rhea v. General Atomics
- Perkin v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.
- Terry v. D3 Technologies CA4/1
- Johnson v. San Diego Unified Port Dist. CA4/1
- Pastor v. Kennedy CA4/1