O'Rourke
D+
98% — 809.0 of 828 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 67% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- In re S.A. CA4/1
- People v. Hilburn
- People v. Wermuty CA4/1
- Saenz v. City of San Bernardino CA4/1
- People v. Smith CA4/1
- In re A.M. CA4/1
- People v. Brown CA4/1
- People v. Keosengthong CA4/1
- Rheinhart v. Nissan North America
- People v. Miller CA4/1
- People v. Codinha
- Save Our Access v. City of San Diego
- Corrales v. California Gambling Control Commission CA4/1
- Maddox v. Maddox CA4/1
- In re Athviel G. CA4/1
- People v. Blake CA4/1
- Tucker v. Heritage Custom Estates Association CA4/1
- Werker v. West Coast Smiles CA4/1
- People v. Cruz CA4/1
- Chan v. Hernandez CA4/1
- G.M. v. H.D. CA4/1
- Onwuka v. Dept. of Corrections & Rehabilitation CA4/1
- McConnell v. Advantest America
- People v. Tate CA4/1
- In re L.B. CA4/1