O'Rourke
D+
98% — 809.0 of 828 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 67% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- People v. Guerrero CA4/1
- People v. Curry CA4/1
- Mesquite Country Club etc. v. Save Oswit Canyon CA4/1
- People v. Bruno CA4/1
- People v. Wight CA4/1
- People v. Halbert CA4/1
- Cintron v. Lizarraga CA4/1
- People v. Fletcher CA4/1
- People v. Steeg CA4/1
- Let Them Choose v. San Diego Unified School Dist.
- Ross v. County of Riverside CA4/1
- People v. Fernandez CA4/1
- People v. Templar CA4/1
- Hitz v. Rutter CA4/1
- Marriage of Nakajima and Chapman CA4/1
- People v. Tamayo CA4/1
- CBRE v. Super. Ct.
- People v. Powers CA4/1
- CBRE v. Super. Ct.
- Maraziti v. Wilmington Trust, Nat. Assn. CA4/1
- People v. Hurst CA4/1
- People v. Hunter CA4/1
- People v. Williams CA4/1
- People v. Grey CA4/1
- People v. Bender CA4/1