O'Rourke
D+
98% — 809.0 of 828 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 67% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- George v. Ingram Micro Services CA4/1
- In re M.M. CA4/1
- People v. Godfrey CA4/1
- Hilltop Group, Inc. v. County of San Diego
- In re N.C. CA4/1
- People v. Fitch CA4/1
- People v. Meneses CA4/1
- Marriage of Schuck and Emert CA4/1
- People v. Isaacs CA4/1
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. City of Los Angeles
- People v. Sucaldito CA4/1
- Chases v. Chases CA4/1
- Mayo v. Discovery Health Services CA4/1
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. City of Los Angeles CA4/1
- Myers v. Sundby CA4/1
- Simmons v. EHM Architecture CA4/1
- Leahy v. Peterson
- Bein v. Seeley CA4/1
- People v. Silva CA4/1
- People v. Warren CA4/1
- Hernandez v. North County Transit Dist. CA4/1
- People v. Guzman CA4/1
- Dornan v. Gonzalez CA4/1
- Williams v. Hefflin CA4/1
- People v. Tellechea CA4/1