William J. Murray, Jr.
Associate Justice, California Court of Appeal, 3rd District 2010– · Presiding Justice, Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin 2008–2009
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
1cases reviewed on appeal
540opinions authored
817panels sat on (not as author)
—1 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1929 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Amsby v. Dickhouse
- Ferguson v. Miller
- Plume v. Seward
- Abell v. Calderwood
- Lindsay v. Flint
- Arnold v. Van Brunt
- Eldridge v. Cowell
- Winans v. Christy
- Hicks v. Davis
- Burgoyne v. Middleton
- Matthey v. Gally
- People v. Coleman
- Mayor of Sacramento v. The Steamer Confidence
- Mayor of Sacramento v. The Steamer New World
- Welton v. Adams & Co.
- Minturn v. Fisher
- Hutchinson v. Perley
- Engels v. Lubeck
- Toothaker v. Cornwall
- Mayo v. Madden
- Cook v. McChristian
- Rich v. Davis
- Flint v. Lyon
- Baker v. Cornwall
- Jones v. Post