William J. Murray, Jr.
Associate Justice, California Court of Appeal, 3rd District 2010– · Presiding Justice, Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin 2008–2009
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
1cases reviewed on appeal
540opinions authored
817panels sat on (not as author)
—1 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1929 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Duprey v. Moran
- Hawley v. Delmas
- Wood v. City of San Francisco
- People v. Logan
- Taylor v. Brown
- Domingues v. Domingues
- Gray v. Schupp
- Sampson v. Hammond
- Hernandez v. Simon
- Minturn v. Lisle
- People ex rel. McDougall v. Bell
- Reed v. Grant
- People v. Peralta
- Prow v. Munie
- People ex rel. Thorne v. Hays
- Grayson v. Guild
- Cronise v. Garghill
- De Ro v. Cordes
- City of San Francisco v. Scott
- McDermott v. Isbell
- Zane v. Crowe
- Gouldin v. Buckelew
- Lurvey v. Wells
- Parker v. Smith
- Taylor v. McKinley