William J. Murray, Jr.
Associate Justice, California Court of Appeal, 3rd District 2010– · Presiding Justice, Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin 2008–2009
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
1cases reviewed on appeal
540opinions authored
817panels sat on (not as author)
—1 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1929 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Smith v. Harper
- Morgan v. Lowe, Ebbets & Co.
- Payne v. Treadwell
- Fitzgerald v. Urton
- Barnstead v. Empire Mining Co.
- People v. Applegate
- Brooks v. Hager
- Brock v. Herrick
- People v. Backus
- Edgar v. Gray
- Beard v. Knox
- Sanchez v. Roach
- In re Manchester
- Samuels v. Gorham
- Ramirez v. Murray
- Low v. Mayor & Common Council of Marysville
- Cohen v. Barrett
- Weston v. Bear River
- Dunlap v. Kelsey
- Humphreys v. Crane
- City of San Francisco v. Hazen
- Martinez v. Gallardo
- Engels, Hooper & Co. v. McKinley & Garioch
- De Johnson v. Sepulbeda
- Redman v. Gulnac