William J. Murray, Jr.
Associate Justice, California Court of Appeal, 3rd District 2010– · Presiding Justice, Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin 2008–2009
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
1cases reviewed on appeal
540opinions authored
817panels sat on (not as author)
—1 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1929 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Chipman v. Hibberd
- Castro v. Castro
- Strong v. Patterson
- People v. Fisher
- Osborne v. Endicott
- People v. Town of Nevada
- Soule v. McKibben
- Groschen v. Page
- Dewey v. Latson
- Chenery v. Palmer
- People v. Freeland
- People ex rel. Attorney Gen. v. Phœnix
- People v. Kent
- Shay v. Tuolumne Cty. Water Co.
- O'Callaghan v. Booth & Deal
- Matoon v. Eder
- Daumiel v. Gorham
- Merrill v. Gorham
- Ritchie v. Dorland
- Page v. Randall
- People v. Porter
- Robb v. Robb
- Thompson v. Danforth
- Flynn v. Travers
- Wells, Fargo & Co. v. William Mears Colman & Co.