William J. Murray, Jr.
Associate Justice, California Court of Appeal, 3rd District 2010– · Presiding Justice, Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin 2008–2009
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
1cases reviewed on appeal
540opinions authored
817panels sat on (not as author)
—1 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1929 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Frank v. Brady
- People v. Cohen
- Vaughn v. English
- Whipley v. Dewey
- RICKETT v. JOHNSON
- Cunningham v. Hopkins
- People v. Chisholm
- Goodale v. Scannell
- Anthony v. Dunlap
- Webster v. Haworth
- People ex rel. Aylett v. Langdon
- Gunter v. Laffan
- People ex rel. Tallant v. Woods
- Thornburgh v. Hand
- Baker v. Bartol
- Naglee v. Palmer
- Heirs v. Carpenter
- Stafford v. Lick
- Lucas, Turner & Co. v. City of San Francisco
- Stearus v. Aguirre
- McAllister v. Strode
- Dominguez v. Dominguez
- Bushnell v. McCauley
- Meiggs v. Scannell
- People v. Olivera