William J. Murray, Jr.
Associate Justice, California Court of Appeal, 3rd District 2010– · Presiding Justice, Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin 2008–2009
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
1cases reviewed on appeal
540opinions authored
817panels sat on (not as author)
—1 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1929 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Hendrix
- People v. Mathson
- People v. Vela
- People v. Snow
- People v. Vasquez
- People v. Holford
- Modoc County Department of Social Services v. Joshua S.
- People v. Clark
- Friends of Shingle Springs Interchange, Inc. v. County of El Dorado
- Collins v. Sutter Memorial Hospital
- Herrera v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.
- Sacramento County Department of Health & Human Services v. S.J.
- United States v. Buddy Joe Barnard
- Lewis v. United States
- Jaime J. Merino v. United States Marshal
- Jaime J. Merino v. Theodore Hocke, United States Commissioner, Etc., and the United States of America
- Daniel Migdol v. United States
- Stanley Halprin v. United States
- Anthony Joseph Cambiano v. United States
- John Phillip Zannaras, J. P. Robinson, Jr., and U.S. Tungsten Corporation v. Bagdad Corpper Corporation, a Corporation
- Fresholtz v. Board of Trustees
- Haynes v. Meeks
- Palmer v. Boling
- Hill v. King
- Davidson v. Dallas