Miller
C-
98% — 52.0 of 53 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 56% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- Futterman v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan
- Futterman v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.
- In re United States
- California Fair Plan Ass'n v. Garnes
- Grappo v. McMills
- People v. Brown
- People v. Lua
- In re Trejo
- Inland Counties Regional Center, Inc. v. Superior Court of Riverside County
- People v. Oswaldo R.
- San Bernardino County Children & Family Services v. J.K.
- Clary v. City of Crescent City
- County of Riverside v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
- Espinoza v. Shiomoto
- People v. Van Orden
- People v. Russell
- People v. Stapleton
- Lynn v. Tatitlek Support Services, Inc.
- People v. Clark
- People v. Garcia
- People v. Starski
- In re Perez
- People v. Brown
- People v. N.C.
- Drakes Bay Oyster Co. v. California Coastal Commission