Miller
C-
98% — 52.0 of 53 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 56% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- People v. Oviedo CA4/2
- In re E.N. CA1/2
- People v. Young CA1/2
- Marriage of Stupp and Schilders CA1/2
- People v. Clay D. CA1/2
- Prestige Autotech Corp. v. Wuxi Chenhwat Almatech Co. CA4/2
- People v. Arana CA1/2
- People v. Mayes CA1/2
- People v. Salinas CA1/2
- People v. Young CA1/2
- In re Esteban M. CA1/2
- People v. Arana CA1/2
- People v. Patterson CA1/2
- Hogan v. DeAngelis Construction CA1/2
- People v. Stecker CA1/2
- People v. Chilton CA1/2
- In re Mark C.
- Reuser v. County of Humboldt CA1/2
- People v. Johnson
- Pack v. Hoge Fenton Jones & Appel, Inc. CA1/2
- Gray & Jimenez v. Jewish Federation of Palm Springs
- Koch v. Scientific Image Center Management CA1/2
- Wong v. Barber CA1/2
- People v. Bahena CA1/2
- Harrison v. City of Rancho Mirage