Miller
C-
98% — 52.0 of 53 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 56% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Bonome v. City of Riverside
- People v. Edward B.
- People v. Angel
- United States ex rel. Lupo v. Quality Assurance Services, Inc.
- Betancourt v. Prudential Overall Supply
- Hudson v. Superior Court of Riverside County
- In re Marriage of McLain
- Hernandez v. Town of Apple Valley
- Hernandez v. Ross Stores, Inc.
- Committee for Re-Evaluation of the T-Line Loop v. San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency
- People v. Doyle
- Romero v. Securus Technologies, Inc.
- Building Industry Ass'n of the Bay Area v. City of San Ramon
- In re Brigham
- People v. Clahr CA1/2
- Rafferty v. Suess CA1/2
- People v. Nassetta
- In re Miguel O. CA1/2
- People v. Varner
- In re Brigham
- People v. Ram CA1/2
- Cal. Public Utilities Com. v. Super. Ct.
- People v. Kilgore CA1/2
- People v. Prado CA1/2
- People v. Ram CA1/2