Michael M. Anello
Judge, District Court, S.D. California 2008–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 67 reversed 12 reversed in part 6 vacated 4 dismissed 3 remanded 2
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 9 reversed 1 dismissed 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2020 14 · 2019 12 · 2010 12 · 2018 10 · 2011 9 · 2026 6 · 2021 6 · 2017 6 · 2015 4 · 2016 3 · 2013 3 · 2025 2 · 2024 2 · 2023 2 · 2022 2 · 2012 2 · 2000 2 · 2014 1 · 2008 1 · 2007 1 · 2005 1 ·
Analysis
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- McGraw v. Pacifica Ashwood LLC
- Clemente Huerta-Jimenez v. Chad Wolf
- Allen v. Quillen
- Mitchell v. Chula Vista Parole
- Ninteman v. The Dutra Group
- Citizens Insurance Company of America v. Chief Digital Advisors
- Basham v. Midland Funding, LLC
- Basham v. Midland Funding, LLC
- Sean Hartranft v. Midland Funding, LLC
- Allen v. Quillen
- Doe v. Steele
- Hawes v. Unknown
- Frantz v. Force Factor, LLC
- Prunty v. Camp Pendleton & Quantico Housing LLC
- Lonnie Keenan v. Cox Communications
- Savills Inc. v. Musgjerd
- Basham v. Midland Funding, LLC
- Basham v. Midland Funding, LLC
- Freshpoint Atlanta, Inc. v. Haywood
- Huerta v. Nielsen
- United States v. Ravneet Singh
- Luckett v. Sudbury
- McGraw v. Pacifica Ashwood LLC
- United States v. Apolinar Figueroa-Vargas
- Sargent v. Southern California Edison 401(k) Savings Plan