Allen v. Quillen
- Proceeding
- district
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Michael M. Anello (author)
Analysis
The court reviewed a pro se civil rights complaint filed by a state prisoner who had neither paid the required $400 filing fee nor filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The court dismissed the action without prejudice and granted the plaintiff 45 days to either pay the fee or file a compliant IFP motion.
| What the court decided | The model |
|---|---|
Dismissal of the civil action without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis.“DISMISSES this action without prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to pay filing fee or file a Motion to Proceed /FP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) and 1915(a).” | agree with court The dismissal is procedurally correct because 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) mandates a filing fee for civil actions, and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) provides the exclusive statutory mechanism for waiving that fee. Since the plaintiff failed to satisfy either requirement, the court lacked the authority to proceed with the case. Dismissing without prejudice is the standard remedy to allow the plaintiff to cure the defect. |
Granting of 45 days leave to prepay the filing fee or file a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.“GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is to: (a) prepay the entire civil filing fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP.” | agree with court Granting a short period to cure a procedural deficiency is within the court's discretion and aligns with local rules (S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2(b)) and the purpose of the IFP statute to ensure access to the courts for indigent litigants. |
The order itself: sound — The order correctly identifies the statutory prerequisites for commencing a civil action (payment of fee or IFP status). It accurately cites the relevant statutes and Ninth Circuit precedent regarding the consequences of failing to meet these prerequisites. The dismissal without prejudice and the grant of time to cure are standard and appropriate procedural measures. The reasoning is complete and directly addresses the deficiency in the filing.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL DEWAYNE ALLEN, Case No. 20cv2192-MMA (DEB) CDCR#T-55834, 12 ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL Plaintiffs, 13 ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE vs. FOR FAILING TO PAY 14 FILING FEE REQUIRED C.O. QUILLEN, et al., 15 BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) AND/OR Defendants. FAILING TO MOVE TO PROCEED 16 IN FORMA PAUPERIS 17 PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) 18 19 Plaintiff Michael Dewayne Allen, a state prisoner incarcerated at the R.J. Donovan 20 Correctional Facility proceeding pro se, has filed a civil right complaint pursuant to 42 21 U.S.C. § 1983. See Doc. No. 1. Plaintiff has not prepaid the $400 civil filing fee 22 required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) and has not filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma 23 Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 24 I. Failure to Pay Filing Fee or Request IFP Status 25 All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the 26 United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of 27 $400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). The action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to 28 prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1 § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); Rodriguez v. 2 Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). However, the Prison Litigation Reform Act’s 3 (“PLRA”) amendments to § 1915 require that all prisoners who proceed IFP to pay the 4 entire fee in “increments” or “installments,” Bruce v. Samuels, __ U.S. __, 136 S. Ct. 5 627, 629 (2016); Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir. 2015), and 6 regardless of whether their action is ultimately dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & 7 (2); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002). 8 Section 1915(a)(2) requires all persons seeking to proceed without full prepayment 9 of fees to file an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets possessed and 10 demonstrates an inability to pay. See Escobedo v. Applebee’s, 787 F.3d 1226, 1234 (9th 11 Cir. 2015). In support of this affidavit, the PLRA also requires prisoners to submit a 12 “certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for . . . the 13 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.” 28 U.S.C. 14 § 1915(a)(2); Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1119 (9th Cir. 2005). From the certified 15 trust account statement, the Court assesses an initial payment of 20% of (a) the average 16 monthly deposits in the account for the past six months, or (b) the average monthly 17 balance in the account for the past six months, whichever is greater, unless the prisoner 18 has no assets. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4). The institution having 19 custody of the prisoner then collects subsequent payments, assessed at 20% of the 20 preceding month’s income, in any month in which his account exceeds $10, and forwards 21 those payments to the Court until the entire filing fee is paid. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2); 22 Bruce, 136 S. Ct. at 629. 23 Because Plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) to 24 commence a civil action, nor filed a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 25 § 1915(a), his case cannot proceed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); Andrews, 493 F.3d at 1051. 26 // 27 // 28 // 1 Conclusion and Order 2 Accordingly, the Court: 3 (1) DISMISSES this action without prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to pay 4 filing fee or file a Motion to Proceed /FP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) and 5 || 1915(a). 6 (2) GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is 7 to: (a) prepay the entire civil filing fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to 8 Proceed IFP. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2(b). 9 (3) DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to provide Plaintiff with the Court’s 10 approved form “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma 11 || Pauperis.”! If Plaintiff fails to either prepay the civil filing fee or fully complete and 12 |}submit the enclosed Motion to Proceed JFP within 45 days, this action will remain 13 || dismissed without prejudice based on his failure to satisfy 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a)’s fee 14 ||requirement and without further Order of the Court. 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 || DATE: November 17, 2020 Ll. f DTU _ / □□ 17 HON. MICHAEL M. ANELLO 18 United States District Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 SSS 29 Plaintiff is cautioned that if he chooses to proceed further by submitting a properly supported Motion to 26 || Proceed IFP, his Complaint will be screened before service and may be dismissed sua sponte pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126-27 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc) (noting that 27 U.S.C. § 1915(e) “not only permits but requires” the court to sua sponte dismiss an in forma pauperis 8 complaint that is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim, or seeks damages from defendants who are immune).
Cites, in this corpus
- Lonnie Williams, Jr. v. Daniel Paramo 13-56004 · 2015-01-07