
Michael M. Anello
Judge, District Court, S.D. California 2008–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 67 reversed 12 reversed in part 6 vacated 4 dismissed 3 remanded 2
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 9 reversed 1 dismissed 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2020 14 · 2019 12 · 2010 12 · 2018 10 · 2011 9 · 2026 6 · 2021 6 · 2017 6 · 2015 4 · 2016 3 · 2013 3 · 2025 2 · 2024 2 · 2023 2 · 2022 2 · 2012 2 · 2000 2 · 2014 1 · 2008 1 · 2007 1 · 2005 1 ·
Analysis
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- Shenzhen Zehuijin Investment Center v. Yingkui
- Dawes v. Ausbury
- United States v. Tiedemann
- Theresa Torricellas v. J. Core
- Donaghe v. Sherman Elementary
- Drake v. Bayer Healthcare LLC
- Marks v. United Parks & Resorts, Inc.
- Zoro v. O'Malley
- United States v. Thomas
- Freshpoint Atlanta, Inc. v. Haywood
- National Public Radio, Inc. v. U.S. Central Command
- Labarge v. Elutia, Inc.
- Zoro v. O'Malley
- Morrison v. Yippee Entertainment, Inc.
- Thompson v. RJD CF Warden
- Angga v. Bumble Bee Foods, LLC
- Morton v. County of San Diego
- Labarge v. Elutia, Inc.
- Betts v. Terronez
- King v. Clear and Strategic LLC
- Kimera Labs Inc v. Jayashankar
- Kimera Labs Inc v. Jayashankar
- Kimera Labs Inc v. Jayashankar
- Wilson v. Macomber
- Juarez v. Hill