
Michael M. Anello
Judge, District Court, S.D. California 2008–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 67 reversed 12 reversed in part 6 vacated 4 dismissed 3 remanded 2
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 9 reversed 1 dismissed 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2020 14 · 2019 12 · 2010 12 · 2018 10 · 2011 9 · 2026 6 · 2021 6 · 2017 6 · 2015 4 · 2016 3 · 2013 3 · 2025 2 · 2024 2 · 2023 2 · 2022 2 · 2012 2 · 2000 2 · 2014 1 · 2008 1 · 2007 1 · 2005 1 ·
Analysis
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases authored (every role)
- Springs v. Raber
- Keavney v. O'Brian
- Barr v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
- Carr v. McDowell
- Scott v. Yoo
- Rosenthal v. Newsome
- D.C. v. County of San Diego
- Delatorre v. Richard J Donovan
- In Re In the matter of the Complaint of Harry Funk and Laura Glaves-Funk
- Barr v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
- Cavalier v. Newsom
- Tapia v. Frontwave Credit Union
- Rivera III v. Attorney General Monty Wilkinson
- G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Zarazua
- G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Hernandez
- Bernard v. City of San Diego
- Springs v. Raber
- Jones v. Pollard
- Pinuelas v. Saul
- Dawes v. The People of the State of California
- Grady v. Alonzo
- Franklin v. Gomez
- Carr v. McDowell
- Jones v. Pollard
- Blackmer v. Six Named Agents of the U.S. Department of Justice