gno.law
Michael M. Anello
Work of Federal Government · source

Michael M. Anello

Judge · Superior Court of San Diego County · 2000–2026

Judge, District Court, S.D. California 2008–

B+
75% — 9 of 12 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 25% of 312 graded judges

On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.

101cases reviewed on appeal
711opinions authored
717panels sat on (not as author)
25%reversed, in whole or part, of 89 merits decisions

Outcomes on appeal

affirmed 67 reversed 12 reversed in part 6 vacated 4 dismissed 3 remanded 2

The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets

affirmed 9 reversed 1 dismissed 1

Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.

Areas

civil 72 criminal 29

By year: 2020 14 · 2019 12 · 2010 12 · 2018 10 · 2011 9 · 2026 6 · 2021 6 · 2017 6 · 2015 4 · 2016 3 · 2013 3 · 2025 2 · 2024 2 · 2023 2 · 2022 2 · 2012 2 · 2000 2 · 2014 1 · 2008 1 · 2007 1 · 2005 1 ·

Analysis

13reviewed cases analysed
56rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
1cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable

Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.

Cases

  1. Blake v. Calalang 3:21-cv-01875 · 2022-02-23 · civil
  2. Scott v. Yoo 3:21-cv-01319 · 2022-02-23 · civil
  3. Skylar v. Saul 3:19-cv-01581-MMA-NLS · 2022-02-16 · civil
  4. Produce Pay, Inc. v. FVF Distributors Inc. 3:20-cv-00517 · 2022-02-15 · civil
  5. 3139 Mount Whitney Rd. Trust Dated 06/14/2021 v. Toner 3:22-cv-00189 · 2022-02-15 · civil
  6. Arellano v. Olson 3:21-cv-01685 · 2022-02-04 · civil
  7. Dawes v. The People of the State of California 3:19-cv-02122 · 2022-02-03 · civil
  8. Garcia v. Allison 3:21-cv-01991 · 2022-02-03 · civil
  9. Demand Hair Lounge v. Midvale Indemnity Company 3:21-cv-02051 · 2022-02-02 · civil
  10. Maddern v. Austin 3:21-cv-01298 · 2022-01-28 · civil
  11. Jones v. Peng 3:21-cv-01912 · 2022-01-28 · civil
  12. Justice v. Unnamed Deptuy Sgt 3:21-cv-02066 · 2022-01-25 · civil
  13. Maddern v. Austin 3:21-cv-01298 · 2022-01-24 · civil
  14. David Lemus v. T. Gutierrez 19-55827 · 2022-01-24 · civil · affirmed
  15. Valdez v. Marquez 3:21-cv-01500 · 2022-01-19 · civil
  16. Lien v. City of San Diego 3:21-cv-00224 · 2022-01-14 · civil
  17. Holmes v. Estock 3:16-cv-02458 · 2022-01-14 · civil
  18. D.C. v. County of San Diego 3:15-cv-01868 · 2022-01-14 · civil
  19. Mkoma v. Ace Parking Management, Inc. 3:21-cv-01693 · 2022-01-11 · civil
  20. Rockhold v. Gore 3:21-cv-00835 · 2022-01-10 · civil
  21. Morton v. County of San Diego 3:21-cv-01428 · 2022-01-10 · civil
  22. Reyes v. Allison 3:21-cv-00632 · 2022-01-10 · civil
  23. Degenhardt v. Ford Motor Company 3:21-cv-01921 · 2022-01-10 · civil
  24. Valdez v. Marquez 3:21-cv-01500 · 2022-01-05 · civil
  25. Highfields Capital I LP v. Seaworld Entertainment, Inc. 3:18-cv-01276 · 2021-12-08 · civil