McKee
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- In re Tyler
- Tully v. Tully
- Stanford v. Felt
- Thomason v. Ruggles
- In re Buckley
- Brown v. Central Pacific Railroad Co.
- Hand v. Hand
- Bryant v. Bank of California
- Heinlen v. Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co.
- Wilson v. Barnard
- Sharon v. Sharon
- Rhodes v. Naglee
- People v. O'Brien
- Hart v. W. Union Tel. Co.
- Estate of Apple
- Henderson v. Grammar
- Hill v. Wall
- Reclamation Dist. No. 108 v. Hagar
- Emeric v. Alvarado
- McNamara v. Hammerslag
- Biddel v. Brizzolara
- Anaheim Water Co. v. Semi-Tropic Water Co.
- People v. Wong Ah Teak
- City & County of San Francisco v. Talbot
- Aston v. Nolan