McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- In re Ferguson CA4/1
- Marriage of Gallegos CA4/1
- People v. Henning CA4/1
- In re D.R. CA4/1
- People v. Hamilton CA4/1
- In re G.B. CA4/1
- Equivest v. D.R. West CA4/1
- Gould v. Cal. Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation CA4/1
- One Easy Loan v. Wei CA4/1
- People v. Durantes CA4/1
- People v. Spells CA4/1
- People v. Cassidy CA4/1
- People v. Cortez CA4/1
- In re N,R. CA4/1
- Moore v. City of Lemon Grove
- Marriage of Osborn & Musalman CA4/1
- S.C. v. Super. Ct. CA4/1
- People v. Cruz CA4/1
- People v. Matz CA4/1
- Sizzler USA Restaurants v. Superior Court CA4/1
- People v. Trujillo CA4/1
- People v. Grey CA4/1
- Chong v. Navarro CA4/1
- Passerelle v. Palomar Community College Dist. CA4/1
- People v. Pardo CA4/1