McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Panesar v. Panesar CA4/1
- P. v. Kratt CA4/1
- Michael C. v. Super. Ct. CA4/1
- P. v. Smeltzer CA4/1
- Buckley v. De Jong CA4/1
- P. v. Como CA4/1
- Purton v. Marriott International Inc.
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Robert W.
- In re I.D. CA4/1
- In re Mary B. CA4/1
- Volk v. Bianchi CA4/1
- P. v. Webb CA4/1
- Bergeron v. Payne CA4/1
- In re Omar M. CA4/1
- Premier Patio Heating Specialists v. WestAir Gases & Equipment CA4/1
- In re Phillip Z. CA4/1
- Happy Nails & Spa v. Su
- P. v. Martinez CA4/1
- Acuna v. San Diego Gas & Electric
- P. v. Ryan CA4/1
- Sukumar v. Ballard CA4/1
- In re Devin C. CA4/1
- P. v. Jimenez CA4/1
- Bates v. Chicago Title Co. CA4/1
- P. v. Salih CA4/1