McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- In re Jonathan A. CA4/1
- People v. Harville CA4/1
- People v. Walters CA4/1
- Preserve Poway v. City of Poway
- People v. Lopez CA4/1
- Hakenjos Hall Prof. Services v. Bland CA4/1
- Haslerig v. Dyson CA4/1
- Newman v. Bank of America CA4/1
- P. v. Rivas CA4/1
- People v. Thornton CA4/1
- People v. Thornton CA4/1
- People v. Realmuto CA4/1
- Stump v. Sierra Club CA4/1
- In re Andres
- People v. Rafail CA4/1
- U.S. Grant Hotel Ventures v. American Property Management Corp. CA4/1
- People v. Surrell CA4/1
- People v. King CA4/1
- P. ex rel. Gov. Employees Ins. Co. v. Cruz
- P. v. Hampton CA4/1
- Larson v. Heck CA4/1
- Marriage of Childs CA4/1
- Saterbak v. JP Morgan Chase Bank CA4/1
- In re Ariana B. CA4/1
- Larson v. Barber CA4/1