McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Save Our Heritage Org. v. City of San Diego CA4/1
- County of San Diego Dept. of Child Support Services v. Maki CA4/1
- People v. Thomas CA4/1
- People v. Pirtle CA4/1
- Angelica Textile Services v. Park
- In re H.N. CA4/1
- In re H.R. CA4/1
- Angelica Textile Services v. Park
- People v. Guadarrama CA4/1
- Wise v. DLA Piper
- Marriage of DeRosa CA4/1
- Conservatorship of Lisa S. CA4/1
- Conservatorship of Lisa S. CA4/1
- People v. Cravens CA4/1
- Soroush-Azar v. Palmer CA4/1
- People v. Bonaparte CA4/1
- McCray v. Ryan CA4/1
- Borrelli v. Scott CA4/1
- In re S.J. CA4/1
- People v. Kueny CA4/1
- Lugo v. Good Guys Auto Sales CA4/1
- Bridgeman v. Allen
- Openiano v. First American Title CA4/1
- In re Natalie B. CA4/1
- Yang v. Regents CA4/1